Wednesday, February 17, 2016

On The Media #2

What is the Zika virus and should we be worried?

Once again, this assignment is showing how much I really don't watch the news or keep up with a lot of current events because I have not heard a single thing about this virus or the word Zika for that matter. Usually 'On The Media' has various stories on their weekly show, however clearly this topic is very important because it is the single topic covered in this weeks show. This virus covers a lot of areas of interest and rather than zone in on just one of the 5-7 minute excerpts, I chose to look at all of them to get a good grasp of this virus and what is being done about it.

I first wanted to explore "the Zika poster child" because I believe it taps into both a psychological and social context. In the interview with Patricia Mello, who is a writer for the major newspaper in Brazil; she discusses how the country didn't really react to this virus or do much about it until it started to affect newborns. The same trend followed with the general public,  through not necessarily losing sleep over this virus until they started seeing these photos of the affected infants. Why do we do this with media? Why do we not care about something until it hits a little part in our heart, much like the viral photo of the deceased boy on the beach? I think that it's become this way partly because of social trends. Print media no longer reaches the mass public and therefore doesn't get much thought. A photo however gets liked, shared, posted, blogged and spreads like wildfire. A photo metaphorically is worth a thousand words and each person relates to it differently. The photo of this child affected by the Zika Virus is a social aspect because it turned this virus from a public problem to a community problem.

The other reason we react to photos like this and consequently decide to finally take action is also a psychological one. One of the most effective ways to persuade someone is through pathos (or emotion). Simply telling someone, "hey there is a very harmful Zika virus going around, we really should take action to combat this" isn't as effective as showing a picture or video of a woman holding her infected baby and crying. Our brains like connections and concepts to build relationships of things that we can use when certain stimuli presents itself. So when we see a photo or video (especially of children) trying to promote something, chances are we will listen and act. We do this because we can relate to that, whether it's on a human basis, a parent basis, love basis ect.

I also listened to the podcast of Brooke Gladstone interviewing Jonathan Katz, a reporter who caught the Zika virus, however not the associated panic. I laughed a few times while listening to this because he was so blunt and realistic about it all. I like that he wasn't trying to say that this Virus isn't something that needs to be addressed but he thinks it doesn't do any good for the media to just scare people. This is a major cultural issue especially in the United States. The media always seems to exasperate issues and people get concerned and worked up over something they know very little about. I like that Ebola was also brought up and the few "moments of fame" it got and now this Zika virus is breaking news. I agree with Jonathan in that we don't need to panic about the Zika virus, we need to educate ourselves on what it is and take the necessary steps to prevent it.

I think this is a hard issue to have a "stand" on because it's not like I can really choose to support or believe in the virus ha ha. It really helped tuning into this weeks show and educating myself on what this virus is and how it may or may not affect me. I really think there is a problem with people listening to the news or following social media on a matter and taking it face value. It's easy for people to say "oh this is global crisis! I am never leaving my house again!" On the other side it is easy to claim that it's not an issue, it doesn't affect me. I myself, found myself saying, "well just kill off all the mosquitos, problem solved!" According to the interview with Nikos Vasilakis, it isn't that easy. I think the biggest concern now is the virus slowly making its way to the United States and of course the devastating effects it is having on infants. I believe these are very valid concerns and ones that definitely need to be addressed. As far as how, I honestly don't have an answer.

5 comments:

  1. It's so interesting to think about the power of a photo in the media. A photo of afflicted children strikes an emotional cord within us, which causes us to finally act. The photo captures the one perspective that the reporters are looking for, emotion. I'm actually doing an entire research project on this very idea. My History and Theory of Photography class created an online survey to gain insight on what made the drowned Syrian boy's photograph so influential. The most popular response? Emotion. People felt their emotions come alive when they viewed that little boy laying face down in the beach. These photos do have the power to blow the issue out of proportion, which is why people suddenly have such strong opinions on the matter similar to the Zika virus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. McKade,

      Thank you for commenting on my post! Have you ever seen Nightcrawler? It's on Netflix and it basically explores this exact concept (in a very extreme, cinematic way of course). It could be a good resource for your project! I think it is a little upsetting with some photos that become viral, not that I get offended left and right, I just don't understand why some photos need to be made public. I felt this way about the boy on the beach. I have a daughter around the same age so that photo made me sick and almost in tears. Is that really necessary? I could have just as easily been moved to action by a photo of a Syrian family looking sad and helpless but a deceased child?? Thankfully the Zika poster child wasn't anything graphic but it still made a point that resonated with people. Thanks for your insights on this!

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Holly,

    As you said this isn't a topic that you can debate whether good or bad/right or wrong, but instead just be informed. This is the first time I had heard of Zika which made me wonder if it was serious or not until I saw the picture of the poster child. This picture just hits close to home if you are a parent or just a love for children as I do. But at the same time, what can I do? I can have all these emotions, but I feel helpless in the solution. To be supportive and informed will have to do for now. Great job exploring all three aspects of the story. I really enjoyed your post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shelby,

      Thank you for commenting on my post! I'm glad that you understand my point of not being able to take a stand on this, it was good to learn more about it though so I can appropriately react to the news stories and things I hear/see on social media. I totally agree with you on the photos of children hitting home where I do have a daughter, it makes it really hard not to react emotionally. Again, I agree with you that the only thing these graphic photos accomplish is getting people fired up and emotional, but does it actually make them act? Like you, it didn't make me do anything.

      Delete